rolex submariner 14060m 2 liner vs 4 leiner | rolex 4 liner vs 14060 rolex submariner 14060m 2 liner vs 4 leiner The 2-line version is THE classic Sub, closest to the original. Plus, they're not . $1,856.00
0 · rolex watch 14060
1 · rolex 4 liner vs 14060
2 · rolex 14060m review
3 · rolex 14060m 2 liner
4 · rolex 14060m 2 line vs 4 line
The Oyster Perpetual Date has been a staple in the Rolex catalog since the 1950s. Thus, there is a wide variety of vintage watches available. Two of the earliest models bear the reference numbers 6534 and 6535.
I thought both the 2 line and 4 line 14060m used the identical 3130 movement. The ones sent for certification got the 4 line designation, the others were 2 liners. I didn't know that .The 2-line version is THE classic Sub, closest to the original. Plus, they're not . The 2-line version is THE classic Sub, closest to the original. Plus, they're not being made any more, making them even cooler. The 4-line version is still being made, as far as I .
The only way I'd keep both is if they looked (relatively) different, such as an early 2-liner with nice patina tritium dial and hands and a slightly faded bezel insert, and then maybe a .
The 2 liner is the exact same watch as the 4 liner. The difference is that the movement inside is not certified to COSC standards. All that goes out the window after the first . I thought both the 2 line and 4 line 14060m used the identical 3130 movement. The ones sent for certification got the 4 line designation, the others were 2 liners. I didn't know that they were finished differently.
The 2-line version is THE classic Sub, closest to the original. Plus, they're not being made any more, making them even cooler. The 4-line version is still being made, as far as I know. For now, anyway.
The only way I'd keep both is if they looked (relatively) different, such as an early 2-liner with nice patina tritium dial and hands and a slightly faded bezel insert, and then maybe a new(ish) shiny 4-liner with luminova. The 2 liner is the exact same watch as the 4 liner. The difference is that the movement inside is not certified to COSC standards. All that goes out the window after the first service anyway, as any competent watchmaker can regulate the movement to perform within COSC standards.Are the ref. 14060 and the ref. 14060M the absolute best of both worlds when it comes to the Rolex Submariner? There are certainly plenty of points in their favor. Each preserves the iconic shape of the great vintage references of the past.
Finding a Rolex Submariner 14060M is easy despite the fact that most consumers buy the Submariner Date. Also, compared to other Submariner references, the chronometer rated version was produced for a relatively short period but they were still mass-produced.Two-liner vs. four-liner. Many a Rollie WIS will wear one but not the other while some don’t consider their collection complete without both. The 14060M outlasted all other Rolex sports watches of its generation. As a result, they only had ‘Submariner’ and ‘1000ft=300m’ written above the six o’clock marker; hence ‘2-liner’. Those later models which had passed their tests included that extra copy and became ‘4-liners’ in collector-speak.
I have a 14060M 2 liner. It just wasn’t clear in your post that the 14060M first came out with a 2 liner version which the only identifiable difference is in the bezel. The 4 and the 5 are different. If you look above, you’ll probably shake your noggin at my subheading. For roughly €10K, it’s possible to find a “4-liner” Submariner 14060M with boxes and papers. That’s a solid 60% appreciation over list price, but I still find it approachable versus today’s 124060. I thought both the 2 line and 4 line 14060m used the identical 3130 movement. The ones sent for certification got the 4 line designation, the others were 2 liners. I didn't know that they were finished differently.
The 2-line version is THE classic Sub, closest to the original. Plus, they're not being made any more, making them even cooler. The 4-line version is still being made, as far as I know. For now, anyway. The only way I'd keep both is if they looked (relatively) different, such as an early 2-liner with nice patina tritium dial and hands and a slightly faded bezel insert, and then maybe a new(ish) shiny 4-liner with luminova.
The 2 liner is the exact same watch as the 4 liner. The difference is that the movement inside is not certified to COSC standards. All that goes out the window after the first service anyway, as any competent watchmaker can regulate the movement to perform within COSC standards.Are the ref. 14060 and the ref. 14060M the absolute best of both worlds when it comes to the Rolex Submariner? There are certainly plenty of points in their favor. Each preserves the iconic shape of the great vintage references of the past. Finding a Rolex Submariner 14060M is easy despite the fact that most consumers buy the Submariner Date. Also, compared to other Submariner references, the chronometer rated version was produced for a relatively short period but they were still mass-produced.Two-liner vs. four-liner. Many a Rollie WIS will wear one but not the other while some don’t consider their collection complete without both. The 14060M outlasted all other Rolex sports watches of its generation.
As a result, they only had ‘Submariner’ and ‘1000ft=300m’ written above the six o’clock marker; hence ‘2-liner’. Those later models which had passed their tests included that extra copy and became ‘4-liners’ in collector-speak.I have a 14060M 2 liner. It just wasn’t clear in your post that the 14060M first came out with a 2 liner version which the only identifiable difference is in the bezel. The 4 and the 5 are different.
rolex watch 14060
rolex 4 liner vs 14060
rolex 14060m review
$2,000.00
rolex submariner 14060m 2 liner vs 4 leiner|rolex 4 liner vs 14060
